JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 7, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Avellaneda Barbosa Efrain Y Otros·Respondent Ministerio De Salud Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Aplicacion Del Decreto 1382 De 2000.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela de la referencia a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Quince Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, toda vez se le dio aplicación al Decreto 1382 de 2000 que resulta contrario a la Constitución, por lo tanto la Corte encontró que en este proceso ha debido inaplicarse y no podía servir de fundamento para otorgar la competencia al Tribunal que profirió la decisión de instancia.

En consecuencia, se devolvió el expediente al citado Juzgado para que realice trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela de la referencia, a partir del auto de doce de diciembre de 2000, proferido por el Juzgado Quince Civil del Circuito de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria al Juzgado Quince Civil del Circuito, para que de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.